NEW DELHI,15 Jan 2026 : Serious allegations of large-scale cash transfers have cast a shadow over the ongoing municipal elections in Maharashtra, with the opposition accusing the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) of orchestrating a massive exercise in electoral manipulation to retain control over key urban centres, particularly Mumbai and Pune.
According to the opposition leaders, payments ranging from ₹1,000 to ₹5,000 per vote have allegedly been made in several constituencies, claims that have been repeatedly aired on television debates and public platforms over the past few days.
Political observers argue that the intensity of the contest is directly linked to the enormous economic power concentrated in Maharashtra’s municipal bodies. Control over the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), Greater Mumbai and the Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) region is seen as crucial, as these institutions together form the financial backbone or “milch cow” of the state.
Besides Mumbai, other urban bodies such as Thane, Pune, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Nashik, Nagpur and Aurangabad command vast budgets, real estate leverage and regulatory authority, making them centres of immense political and commercial influence.
In effect, whoever dominates these civic institutions gains control over Maharashtra’s economic nerve centres.
However, the analysts point out that the battle is not merely about money and administrative power. Beneath the surface lies a deeper ideological contest. Critics of the ruling establishment allege that the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and its affiliates are attempting to gradually displace Maharashtra’s long-standing progressive and reformist intellectual traditions.
These traditions, shaped by saint-poets like Dnyaneshwar and Tukaram and later by social reformers such as Gopal Ganesh Agarkar, Justice M.G. Ranade, Jyotiba Phule, Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj and Dr B.R. Ambedkar, have historically emphasised rationality, social justice and egalitarian values.
The fear, opposition leaders say, is that this legacy is being systematically undermined through institutional and cultural control.
Adding to the controversy are a series of election-related “goof-ups,” particularly concerning voter lists and polling-day enforcement. In Nashik, a BJP worker was reportedly caught distributing bundles of currency notes on the day of polling itself, an incident that has further fuelled allegations of brazen malpractice.
Similar complaints about discrepancies in voter rolls and last-minute mobilisation tactics have surfaced from multiple urban pockets. Taken together, these developments suggest that the stakes in the municipal elections are extraordinarily high.
Several commentators warn that if such practices continue unchecked, Maharashtra could be heading towards a wider political and social confrontation, with urban governance becoming the flashpoint.
Interestingly, there are also signs of nervousness within the ruling party. Sources claim that during a closed-door meeting of the BJP’s Pune unit on Tuesday, senior functionaries privately admitted that what was initially expected to be a cakewalk has turned into a steep uphill task. Party karyakartas were reportedly instructed to remain “on your feet” for the next 72 hours, underscoring the intensity of the final push.
The emerging picture, therefore, is of an election being fought on multiple fronts—not just for municipal power, but for control over money, institutions and the ideological future of Maharashtra itself.
Picture credit social media
